LawsuitGuide.org

AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview

Last updated: April 9, 2026

What Is the AFFF Lawsuit?

Thousands of firefighters, military personnel, and airport workers are filing lawsuits alleging that Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) — a firefighting foam used to extinguish fuel-based fires — caused them to develop cancer and other serious diseases.

AFFF contains PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), commonly known as "forever chemicals" because they do not break down in the environment or the human body. These chemicals accumulate over time and have been linked to multiple types of cancer.

The lawsuits target manufacturers including 3M Company, DuPont (now Chemours), Tyco Fire Products, Kidde-Fenwal, and National Foam.

What Are PFAS "Forever Chemicals"?

PFAS are a class of over 4,000 synthetic chemicals used in AFFF and many consumer products. They are called "forever chemicals" because:

  • They do not biodegrade — they persist in the environment indefinitely
  • They accumulate in the human body over time
  • They contaminate drinking water near military bases, airports, and fire training facilities
  • The EPA has determined that there is no safe level of exposure to certain PFAS

Who Was Exposed to AFFF?

Occupation How Exposed
Firefighters Used AFFF foam regularly in training and emergency response
Military personnel Used AFFF at bases, aircraft hangars, and aboard ships
Airport workers AFFF used at airport fire training facilities
Chemical plant workers AFFF used for industrial fire suppression
Nearby residents PFAS contaminated groundwater near bases and training sites

Cancers and Diseases Linked to AFFF

Scientific research and the EPA have linked PFAS exposure to:

  • Kidney cancer
  • Testicular cancer
  • Bladder cancer
  • Liver cancer
  • Prostate cancer
  • Thyroid disease (including thyroid cancer)
  • Ulcerative colitis
  • Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • Pancreatic cancer

What Are Plaintiffs Alleging?

The lawsuits allege that 3M, DuPont, and other manufacturers:

  • Knew since the 1960s-70s that PFAS were toxic and accumulated in human blood
  • Concealed internal research showing the health risks of PFAS exposure
  • Failed to warn firefighters and military personnel about cancer risks
  • Continued manufacturing AFFF foam despite knowing its dangers
  • Contaminated water supplies near military installations and fire training facilities across the country

Internal documents revealed during litigation show that 3M's own scientists raised concerns about PFAS toxicity decades before public awareness.

Current Status of the Litigation

The AFFF litigation is one of the largest mass torts in US history, consolidated as MDL 2873 in the District of South Carolina before Judge Richard Gergel.

Key developments:

  • Over 9,000 cases pending in the MDL
  • 3M settlement: $10.3 billion to resolve municipal water contamination claims (2023)
  • DuPont/Chemours settlement: $1.185 billion for water contamination
  • Individual personal injury claims are still being actively litigated
  • The municipal water settlements do NOT resolve personal injury claims by firefighters and military personnel

Why You Should Act Now

  • Personal injury claims are separate from the water contamination settlements — you may still have a claim
  • Statutes of limitations vary by state and are running
  • Evidence of exposure (employment records, deployment records, training logs) should be preserved now
  • Medical documentation linking your diagnosis to PFAS exposure is essential

A free case review is the first step. Find out if your cancer or illness may be connected to AFFF exposure.

Think You May Qualify?

Get a free, no-obligation case review from an experienced attorney.

Start Your Free Case Review

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This website may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.

This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by using this site or submitting a contact form. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Free Case Review

Find out if you may qualify for compensation. No cost, no obligation.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This website may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.